President Donald Trump’s second term has delivered some wins, but a pattern of half-measures and deferred settlements risks reducing his presidential legacy to a series of temporary patches. His operational mindset is simple: when he cannot achieve something decisively, he declares victory and leaves things unresolved. With the midterm elections approaching, this cowardly approach threatens the GOP’s future, especially if Vice President JD Vance aspires to turn multilateralist episodic deals into party doctrine.
Start with Panama. Trump appealed to serious concerns about China’s 30% share of global cargo to push Panama out of Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative. He secured a February 2026 Supreme Court ruling voiding China’s Hutchison concession and U.S. troop-rotation rights. But no treaty locks in those gains; without permanent operational control, a future Panamanian nationalist backlash could hand the canal back to Beijing.
Recommended Stories
Greenland follows the same script. Tariff threats and military pressure secured a Davos framework, giving Washington partial veto power over mineral development. Yet full acquisition failed, and the Golden Dome’s placement there remains unsettled. Meanwhile, Denmark’s weak sovereignty is leaving Arctic access vulnerable to Russian and Chinese coercion.
CHINA’S SPUTNIK MOMENT: HOW TRUMP CAN WIN WHERE BIDEN FAILED ON AI RACE
Canada offers another interesting case. Trump’s “51st state” rhetoric was paired with 25% non-energy tariffs over border security and fentanyl flows. Ottawa blinked, but no permanent economic integration followed. The tariffs extracted compliance, not a geopolitical redesign: leverage rented by the month, not power built to last.
In Venezuela, America scored a real tactical win by apprehending former Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro earlier this year and routing $3 billion in oil revenues into Washington-controlled vaults. Yet, Trump has delivered neither a democratic succession nor the defeat of “Chavismo.”
Only maximum pressure and Israeli strikes forced Iran to sign a 14-point memorandum on June 17, 2026. The deal paused the fighting and, for now, eased traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. But it left the nuclear stockpile and proxies untouched, kicking both into 60-day talks that the Mullahs can extend whenever they want. Obviously, this is not a victory but just another patchwork with a press release attached.
Cuba is already absorbing secondary sanctions and blackouts without bending. Tehran will do the same if the pressure eases.
Across these theaters, immediate leverage has replaced institutional outcomes. Court rulings without treaties, frameworks without territorial transfers, and short windows without brinkmanship invite reversal the moment American pressure eases. In my judgment, Trump’s “deals” create motion and look durable until the cameras leave.
Congress should enact two structural remedies. A Hemispheric Chokepoint Security Act would grant renewable 99-year U.S. basing rights at the Panama Canal and Greenland, funded solely by seized Venezuelan oil revenues. A Continental Economic Zone could integrate Canada more deeply into defense and trade, short of statehood. The Trump administration should also launch the ‘Periphery Accords for the Americas’ — modeled on the Abraham Accords — to bind the United States, Israel, and regional partners through intelligence sharing to counter Iran’s international capacity-building.
Indisputably, the fatal flaw stands revealed. Trump proved that raw pressure can force adversaries to blink. Without permanence, however, it is only theater.
MEMORANDUM OF MISUNDERSTANDING: US AND IRAN CAN’T AGREE ON WHAT THE TRUMP DEAL SAYS
North Korea delivered the warning in 2018. Summit pageantry fed Trump’s ego, then faded into silence as Kim Jong Un’s nuclear threat slipped from view. Iran now faces the same erasure. When a crisis grows tedious, this White House declares victory and moves on.
A patchwork presidency mistakes the pause for conquest, leaving Republicans to confront the wreckage. The midterm elections will decide whether Trump built on institutions — or merely on the fleeting power of one man’s brand.
Jose Lev Alvarez is an American–Israeli scholar specializing in international security policy. A multilingual veteran of the IDF special forces and the U.S. Army, he holds three master’s degrees and is completing a Ph.D. in Intelligence and Global Security in the Washington, D.C., area.
