The president will sign the bill, which funds Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement for three years, on Wednesday, according to Punchbowl News.

Kiley told reporters ahead of the vote he was leaning no on the spending measure over disappointment that there have not been “meaningful bipartisan reforms to interior immigration enforcement.”

“I think that we need to restore trust and public confidence, and make sure that the mission of the agency is focused, and so I’m disappointed that we haven’t seen a bipartisan agreement along those lines,” Kiley said.

Still, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), a deficit hawk who voted against the Republicans’ first reconciliation bill and is often a thorn in leadership’s side, told reporters ahead of the vote he supported the immigration funding bill because it was one of the “purest spending bills” that’s ever been before him.

“I’ve checked it, they don’t have extraneous laws in there, they don’t have money for other things, it’s just for what it says it’s for, and so I’ll be voting for it,” Massie said.

There was minimal Republican infighting in getting the measure across the finish line. House Education and the Workforce Committee Chairman Tim Walberg (R-MI) was briefly a no vote before flipping to yes. Walberg was seen by reporters talking to several members of leadership on the House floor, including Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-MN) and Conference Chairwoman Lisa McClain (R-MI).

Walberg told the Washington Examiner that he was just “getting the attention of leadership” with his brief no vote, saying it was always his intention to vote yes on the reconciliation bill and he just wanted to “make a point.”

“We had to discuss something relative to my committee and the appropriations process and what I expect as far as help from leadership,” Walberg said.

The education committee chairman said he was “blindsided” by a development out of the appropriations committee on Tuesday but declined to confirm details.

Members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus also extracted a legislative win from GOP leadership earlier in the day in exchange for their support in advancing the bill.

During a test vote, several members of the House Freedom Caucus demanded that leadership attach an immigration bill passed last Congress that would limit asylum and parole to the reconciliation bill in exchange for their votes, a source familiar with the matter told the Washington Examiner.

Leadership denied that demand but agreed to hold a separate vote on the immigration bill, the source explained. A second source told the Washington Examiner that leadership agreed to hold a vote on the immigration bill before July 4, as members of the House Freedom Caucus look to codify Trump’s border policies and “ensure Republican border wins are permanent.”

Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) told reporters after the vote that the House Freedom Caucus was “gratified that we were able to get the funding much needed for ICE and Border Patrol accomplished.”

“Shouldn’t have had to be done through the back door,” Roy said. “Democrats were stonewalling and proud of our Republican conference to get together to get that done. Wish we hadn’t had to do it that way. It’s not the right way to do things, but we did.”

On the deal with leadership, Roy said that in the event a Democrat retakes the White House in the future, “We’ve got to have permanent reforms and permanent changes in order to ensure people don’t come back in, so we had some good conversations about moving the important elements of H.R. 2 sometime here in the next few weeks, hopefully before July 4.”

Republican leadership hoped to pass the reconciliation bill sooner. However, GOP outcry over an “anti-weaponization” fund announced by the Justice Department as part of a settlement agreement with Trump upended plans to usher the reconciliation bill through by a June 1 deadline set by the president.

Republican lawmakers concerned about who would be eligible for payouts from the $1.776 billion fund wanted assurances that the administration would not move forward with the creation of the fund before advancing the immigration enforcement spending bill.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told House lawmakers last week the administration would not pick up plans to establish the fund, assuaging Senate Republican lawmakers.

20 REPUBLICANS BUCK LEADERSHIP TO PASS LABOR REGULATIONS BILL

Rep. Don Bacon (R-NE), who previously expressed opposition to the fund’s creation, told the Washington Examiner he planned to support the reconciliation bill despite it not including a ban on the fund, as the court’s ruling made it a “dead issue.”

The Senate passed the measure last Friday, with only one GOP “no” vote from Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), after an hourslong vote-a-rama that ultimately did not include a ban on the DOJ fund.